## Construction of the Chebyshev Spline

This section discusses these aspects of the Chebyshev spline construction:

### What Is a Chebyshev Spline?

The Chebyshev spline C=Ct=Ck,t of order k for the knot sequence t=(ti: i=1:n+k) is the unique element of Sk,t of max-norm 1 that maximally oscillates on the interval [tk..tn+1] and is positive near tn+1. This means that there is a unique strictly increasing n-sequence τ so that the function C=CtSk,t given by Ci)=(–1)n – 1, all i, has max-norm 1 on [tk..tn+1]. This implies that τ1=tkn=tn+1, and that ti < τi < tk+i, for all i. In fact, ti+1 ≤ τi ti+k–1, all i. This brings up the point that the knot sequence is assumed to make such an inequality possible, i.e., the elements of Sk,t are assumed to be continuous.

In short, the Chebyshev spline C looks just like the Chebyshev polynomial. It performs similar functions. For example, its extreme sites τ are particularly good sites to interpolate at from Sk,t because the norm of the resulting projector is about as small as can be; see the toolbox command `chbpnt`.

You can run the example Construction of a Chebyshev Spline to construct C for a particular knot sequence t.

### Choice of Spline Space

You deal with cubic splines, i.e., with order

```k = 4; ```

and use the break sequence

```breaks = [0 1 1.1 3 5 5.5 7 7.1 7.2 8]; lp1 = length(breaks); ```

and use simple interior knots, i.e., use the knot sequence

```t = breaks([ones(1,k) 2:(lp1-1) lp1(:,ones(1,k))]); n = length(t)-k;```

Note the quadruple knot at each end. Because `k = 4`, this makes [0..8] = [`breaks(1)`..`breaks`(`lp1`)] the interval [tk..tn+1] of interest, with `n = length(t)`-`k `the dimension of the resulting spline space Sk,t. The same knot sequence would have been supplied by

```t=augknt(breaks,k); ```

### Initial Guess

As the initial guess for the τ, use the knot averages

`${t}_{i}=\left({t}_{i+1}+...+{t}_{i+k-1}\right)/\left(k-1\right)$`

recommended as good interpolation site choices. These are supplied by

```tau=aveknt(t,k); ```

Plot the resulting first approximation to C, i.e., the spline c that satisfies ci)=(–1)n-–i, all i:

```b = cumprod(repmat(-1,1,n)); b = b*b(end); c = spapi(t,tau,b); fnplt(c,'-.') grid ```

Here is the resulting plot.

First Approximation to a Chebyshev Spline

### Remez Iteration

Starting from this approximation, you use the Remez algorithm to produce a sequence of splines converging to C. This means that you construct new τ as the extrema of your current approximation c to C and try again. Here is the entire loop.

You find the new interior τi as the zeros of Dc, i.e., the first derivative of c, in several steps. First, differentiate:

```Dc = fnder(c); ```

Next, take the zeros of the control polygon of Dc as your first guess for the zeros of Dc. For this, you must take apart the spline `Dc`.

```[knots,coefs,np,kp] = fnbrk(Dc,'knots','coefs','n','order'); ```

The control polygon has the vertices (`tstar(i)`,`coefs(i)`), with `tstar` the knot averages for the spline, provided by `aveknt`:

```tstar = aveknt(knots,kp); ```

Here are the zeros of the resulting control polygon of `Dc`:

```npp = (1:np-1); guess = tstar(npp) -coefs(npp).*(diff(tstar)./diff(coefs)); ```

This provides already a very good first guess for the actual zeros.

Refine this estimate for the zeros of Dc by two steps of the secant method, taking `tau` and the resulting `guess` as your first approximations. First, evaluate Dc at both sets:

```sites = tau(ones(4,1),2:n-1); sites(1,:) = guess; values = zeros(4,n-2); values(1:2,:) = reshape(fnval(Dc,sites(1:2,:)),2,n-2); ```

Now come two steps of the secant method. You guard against division by zero by setting the function value difference to 1 in case it is zero. Because Dc is strictly monotone near the sites sought, this is harmless:

```for j=2:3 rows = [j,j-1];Dcd=diff(values(rows,:)); Dcd(find(Dcd==0)) = 1; sites(j+1,:) = sites(j,:) ... -values(j,:).*(diff(sites(rows,:))./Dcd); values(j+1,:) = fnval(Dc,sites(j+1,:)); end ```

The check

```max(abs(values.')) ans = 4.1176 5.7789 0.4644 0.1178 ```

shows the improvement.

Now take these sites as your new `tau`,

```tau = [tau(1) sites(4,:) tau(n)]; ```

and check the extrema values of your current approximation there:

```extremes = abs(fnval(c, tau)); ```

The difference

```max(extremes)-min(extremes) ans = 0.6905 ```

is an estimate of how far you are from total leveling.

Construct a new spline corresponding to the new choice of `tau` and plot it on top of the old:

```c = spapi(t,tau,b); sites = sort([tau (0:100)*(t(n+1)-t(k))/100]); values = fnval(c,sites); hold on, plot(sites,values) ```

The following code turns on the grid and plots the locations of the extrema.

```grid on plot( tau(2:end-1), zeros( 1, np-1 ), 'o' ) hold off legend( 'Initial Guess', 'Current Guess', 'Extreme Locations',... 'location', 'NorthEastOutside' );```

Following is the resulting figure (legend not shown).

A More Nearly Level Spline

If this is not close enough, one simply reiterates the loop. For this example, the next iteration already produces C to graphic accuracy.