Statistics
RANK
126,507
of 300,967
REPUTATION
0
CONTRIBUTIONS
1 Question
1 Answer
ANSWER ACCEPTANCE
0.0%
VOTES RECEIVED
0
RANK
of 21,126
REPUTATION
N/A
AVERAGE RATING
0.00
CONTRIBUTIONS
0 Files
DOWNLOADS
0
ALL TIME DOWNLOADS
0
RANK
of 172,078
CONTRIBUTIONS
0 Problems
0 Solutions
SCORE
0
NUMBER OF BADGES
0
CONTRIBUTIONS
0 Posts
CONTRIBUTIONS
0 Public Channels
AVERAGE RATING
CONTRIBUTIONS
0 Discussions
AVERAGE NO. OF LIKES
Feeds
Answered
Summation with upper limit itself as a variable
i m not getting what is the issue? if i use the same expression without symsum(..), i'm being returned with the optimized values...
Summation with upper limit itself as a variable
i m not getting what is the issue? if i use the same expression without symsum(..), i'm being returned with the optimized values...
12 years ago | 0
Question
Summation with upper limit itself as a variable
i m trying to optimize the following function z=-(r)*(L/M)*(1-(((L/M).^x(1))/((gamma(x(1)+1))*symsum(((L/M).^p)/(gamma(p+1)...
12 years ago | 2 answers | 0
