Does r=uint64(308436464205151562) make sense? It seems like the argument to uint64 is a double precision number, so you have already lost the precision you are trying to gain by using uint64.
r=uint64(308436464205151562) outputs for uint64(r) 308436464205151562. However, r=308436464205151562 outputs for uint64(r) 308436464205151552. A very small loss in precision, but still a loss. The Challenge set has some numbers that use all the paint if full precision math was used. If residual paint was required as an output then full precision is needed. For solutions using p=p-2*r-1 the errors in r and p may cause issues.
Very novel input parameter adjustment to allow direct solution.
That's Muller's method which is more computationally realiable than Bhaskaracharya's.
Nice bisecting search method and anonymous function for clean appearance.
Tic Tac Toe FTW
Inner product of two vectors
Finite Continued Fraction
Count up then down
Wheat on a chessboard pt 2
Chezz_015 : Simplified chess
Usage of java.math : Add, Multiply, Pow
Animated GIF Creator
Play Tic Tac Toe : No Losses Allowed
GJam 2016 Rd1A: Rank and File (small)
Choose a web site to get translated content where available and see local events and offers. Based on your location, we recommend that you select: .
You can also select a web site from the following list:
Select the China site (in Chinese or English) for best site performance. Other MathWorks country sites are not optimized for visits from your location.
Contact your local office