**You are now following this question**

- You will see updates in your followed content feed.
- You may receive emails, depending on your communication preferences.

# plot and fit surface

8 views (last 30 days)

Show older comments

Hello everyone,

I hope that someone can help me.

I'm trying to plot several points in the space and to fit them so I can get an mathematical formula like this topic https://de.mathworks.com/help/curvefit/polynomial.html#bt9ykh7 "Fit and Plot a Polynomial Surface"

I want to get a quadratic polynomial so I'm trying to use 'poly22' function. This is my code:

X = [0; 1; 1; -1; -1; 0.3]

Y = [0; 1 ; -1; -1; 1; 0.5]

Z = [0.9; 0.3; 0; 0.2; 0.6; 1]

plot3(X,Y,Z,'or')

z = Z;

fitsurface=fit([X,Y],z, 'poly22','Normalize','on')

plot(fitsurface, [X,Y],z)

I obtained this results:

Linear model Poly22:

fitsurface(x,y) = p00 + p10*x + p01*y + p20*x^2 + p11*x*y + p02*y^2

where x is normalized by mean 0.05 and std 0.9028

and where y is normalized by mean 0.08333 and std 0.9174

Coefficients:

p00 = 0.9097

p10 = -0.2332

p01 = 0.2645

p20 = -1.07

p11 = -0.02071

p02 = 0.5786

But I am not sure about them and the syntax.

Could you help me please?

Thank you a lot!

Laura

##### 0 Comments

### Accepted Answer

Mahesh Taparia
on 4 Jun 2021

Hi

The syntax and code which you have used is correct. The above code will fit a 2nd degree polynomial to the given data points and this is what you need.

##### 17 Comments

laura bagnale
on 7 Jun 2021

Thank you very much Mahesh for your kind help and reply.

I would like to ask you another help if you are available.

If I wanted to find a surface in space passing through 12 points and then find the interpolating polynomial function of second degree in x y and z (w = f(x,y,z)), should I use poly222? Is the procedure the same or do you have some suggestions?

Thank you very much!

Laura

Walter Roberson
on 7 Jun 2021

There is no poly222 model.

fit() is not designed for three independent variables and one dependent variable.

You would probably be better off forming a vandermode matrix and using \ to do the fitting.

let's see, do you have enough points?

p000 + p001*z + p010*y + p100*x + p002*z.^2 + p020*y.^2 + p200*x.^2 + p011*y.*z + p101*x.*z + p110*x.*y

10 coefficients, assuming that "second degree" does not have x*y*z or a square times a different variable (total degree for term no more than 2)

10 coefficients and 12 samples is mathematically possible. Just do not expect the interpolation to be mathematically stable: a bit of noise could affect the fit a fair bit.

laura bagnale
on 7 Jun 2021

Thank you very much, Walter!

This is very helpful!

I will do as you suggest and hope to be able to do so! :)

Is this the only matlab resource about this topic? https://it.mathworks.com/help/matlab/ref/vander.html

Thank you very much again!

Laura

Walter Roberson
on 7 Jun 2021

You will probably need to construct the matrix by hand. Assuming column vectors and r2015b or newer,

A = [ones(size(x)), x.^(1:2), y.^(1:2), z.^(1:2), x.*y, x.*z, y.*z]

b = w;

p = A\b;

order of results:

p000, p100, p200, p010, p020, p001, p002, p110, p101, p011

You can rearrange the columns if you prefer.

laura bagnale
on 7 Jun 2021

Edited: Walter Roberson
on 7 Jun 2021

Thank you very much fo your answer!

I did the following:

x = [0; 1; 1; -1; -1; 0.3; 0.6; 0.2; 0.4; 0.3; 0.1; 0.5]

y = [0; 1; -1; -1; 1; 0.5; 0.2; 0.4; 0.7; 0.8; 0.9; 0]

z = [0.9; 0.4; 0; 0.1; 0.3; 0.8; 0.5; 0.4; 0.3; 0.7; 0.2; 0.1]

By assuming these 12 points (let's say experimental points where x, y and z are independent variables) I constructed the matrix as you suggested

A = [ones(size(x)), x.^(1:2), y.^(1:2), z.^(1:2), x.*y, x.*z, y.*z]

That represents the Vandermonde matrix, right?

I'm sorry but I didn't understand what do you mean with b = w

b = w;

p = A\b;

How can I assume b = f(x,y,z)=w?

Then I would like to fit them by a hypersurface like f(x,y,z).

Could you still help me, please?

Thank you very much!

Laura

Walter Roberson
on 7 Jun 2021

In order to be able to fit w = f(x,y,z) by a multinomial, then you have to have known w values.

After having constructed the vandermode ( A ) then you would have a classic linear system, that A*p=w which would be solved by p = A\w

But that depends upon having known w.

laura bagnale
on 7 Jun 2021

Thank you very much again for your support!

I have done this with known w-values and it seems to work well.

This is the code

x = [0; 1; 1; -1; -1; 0.3; 0.6; 0.2; 0.4; 0.3; 0.1; 0.5]

y = [0; 1; -1; -1; 1; 0.5; 0.2; 0.4; 0.7; 0.8; 0.9; 0]

z = [0.9; 0.4; 0; 0.1; 0.3; 0.8; 0.5; 0.4; 0.3; 0.7; 0.2; 0.1]

w = [0.3; 1; 0; -1; 0.5; 0.7; 0.5; 0.6; 0.9; 0.2; 0.3; 0.1]

A = [ones(size(x)), x.^(1:2), y.^(1:2), z.^(1:2), x.*y, x.*z, y.*z]

b = w;

p = A\b;

Now I have the A matrix and the p-coefficients vector.

Once I have the function in three variables, how can I fit it?

I used to use fitsurface for functions of two variables, but now I have the function w=f(x,y,z) how can I represent it graphically?

cftool? fimplicit3?

Thank you

Walter Roberson
on 7 Jun 2021

format long g

x = [0; 1; 1; -1; -1; 0.3; 0.6; 0.2; 0.4; 0.3; 0.1; 0.5];

y = [0; 1; -1; -1; 1; 0.5; 0.2; 0.4; 0.7; 0.8; 0.9; 0];

z = [0.9; 0.4; 0; 0.1; 0.3; 0.8; 0.5; 0.4; 0.3; 0.7; 0.2; 0.1];

w = [0.3; 1; 0; -1; 0.5; 0.7; 0.5; 0.6; 0.9; 0.2; 0.3; 0.1];

A = [ones(size(x)), x.^(1:2), y.^(1:2), z.^(1:2), x.*y, x.*z, y.*z]

A = 12×10

1 0 0 0 0 0.9 0.81 0 0 0
1 1 1 1 1 0.4 0.16 1 0.4 0.4
1 1 1 -1 1 0 0 -1 0 0
1 -1 1 -1 1 0.1 0.01 1 -0.1 -0.1
1 -1 1 1 1 0.3 0.09 -1 -0.3 0.3
1 0.3 0.09 0.5 0.25 0.8 0.64 0.15 0.24 0.4
1 0.6 0.36 0.2 0.04 0.5 0.25 0.12 0.3 0.1
1 0.2 0.04 0.4 0.16 0.4 0.16 0.08 0.08 0.16
1 0.4 0.16 0.7 0.49 0.3 0.09 0.28 0.12 0.21
1 0.3 0.09 0.8 0.64 0.7 0.49 0.24 0.21 0.56

b = w;

p = A\b;

pcell = num2cell(p);

[p000, p100, p200, p010, p020, p001, p002, p110, p101, p011] = pcell{:};

f = @(x,y,z) p000 + p001*z + p010*y + p100*x + p002*z.^2 + p020*y.^2 + p200*x.^2 + p011*y.*z + p101*x.*z + p110*x.*y

f = function_handle with value:

@(x,y,z)p000+p001*z+p010*y+p100*x+p002*z.^2+p020*y.^2+p200*x.^2+p011*y.*z+p101*x.*z+p110*x.*y

and now f is the fitted function. You do not need to do any more fitting on it.

Representing it graphically is more of a challenge.

N = 20;

xvec = linspace(min(x), max(x), N);

yvec = linspace(min(y), max(y), N+1);

zvec = linspace(min(z), max(z), N+2);

[X,Y,Z] = meshgrid(xvec, yvec, zvec);

W = f(X, Y, Z);

L = [-.7, -.5, -.3, 0, .3, .5, .7];

for K = 1 : length(L)

isosurface(X, Y, Z, W, L(K));

end

legend(string(L))

laura bagnale
on 7 Jun 2021

I would really like to thank you Walter, for helping me with my question.

Now everything is clearer and I have learned important things from your answers, especially from the last code.

I will try to do it again to fix all the situation!

Thank you so much for your support!

Laura

Walter Roberson
on 7 Jun 2021

laura bagnale
on 8 Jun 2021

Thank you very much for clarifying this further detail to me!

laura bagnale
on 8 Jun 2021

Hi,

if you have time, could you help me a little bit again, please?

I wanted to minimize the previous function and to see the minimum point on the graph. Is my following code correct?

fun = (@(x,y,z) -0.3973 + 2.8392*z + 0.5153*y + 0.7036*x -2.2113*z.^2 -0.1385*y.^2 + 0.3061*x.^2 - 0.5117*y.*z - 1.3679*x.*z - 0.0074*x.*y);

p = optimproblem

p.Description = "minimization"

x = optimvar("x", "LowerBound", -1, "UpperBound",1);

y = optimvar("y", "LowerBound", -1, "UpperBound",1);

z = optimvar("z","LowerBound", -1, "UpperBound",1 );

p.Objective = -0.3973 + 2.8392*z + 0.5153*y + 0.7036*x -2.2113*z.^2 -0.1385*y.^2 + 0.3061*x.^2 - 0.5117*y.*z - 1.3679*x.*z - 0.0074*x.*y

initialPt.x = 0.1;

initialPt.y = 0.1;

initialPt.z = 0.1;

hold on

[sol,fval,exitflag,outout] = solve(p,initialPt)

plot3(sol.x,sol.y, sol.z, 'or','LineWidth',4)

hold off

Is there a more correct way to do so? I tried with these cases:

But without success.

Thank you very much!

Laura

Walter Roberson
on 8 Jun 2021

fun = @(x,y,z) -0.3973 + 2.8392*z + 0.5153*y + 0.7036*x -2.2113*z.^2 -0.1385*y.^2 + 0.3061*x.^2 - 0.5117*y.*z - 1.3679*x.*z - 0.0074*x.*y;

syms x y z

w = fun(x,y,z)

w =

solx = solve(diff(w,x),x)

solx =

w2 = subs(w, x, solx)

w2 =

soly = solve(diff(w2,y),y)

soly =

w3 = subs(w2, y, soly)

w3 =

solz = solve(diff(w3,z), z)

solz =

Z = solz

Z =

Y = subs(soly, z, Z)

Y =

X = subs(subs(solx, y, soly), z, Z)

X =

Xd = double(X)

Xd = 0.0396

Yd = double(Y)

Yd = 0.8851

Zd = double(Z)

Zd = 0.5273

and your task now is to determine whether (X, Y, Z) is the maxima or minima .

laura bagnale
on 9 Jun 2021

Ok, thank you a lot!

It's a bit complicated for me I guess, but I'll study your code and I'll try to do my best!

Laura

laura bagnale
on 9 Jun 2021

I have to conclude that my code was wrong for my purpose, right?

Thank you!

Walter Roberson
on 9 Jun 2021

When you have a minimization problem, analytic solutions are best unless they would take an undue amount of time.

(There are some minimization problems that can be approached probabilisticly to get a likely solution in a relatively short time, but proving that the answer is the best possible might take a long time. There is a famous mathematical problem involving one of the largest numbers ever invented, literally too large to write down in this universe... for a situation where it is suspected that the real minimum is 6. So sometimes it really does not pay to do a complete analysis. But in a situation like the function you have, you might as well go for the analysis and so be sure that you have the right solution.

laura bagnale
on 9 Jun 2021

I understand.

Thank you very much for the quick answers, the explanation and the support!

Kind Regards,

Laura

### More Answers (0)

### See Also

### Categories

### Tags

### Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!**An Error Occurred**

Unable to complete the action because of changes made to the page. Reload the page to see its updated state.

Select a Web Site

Choose a web site to get translated content where available and see local events and offers. Based on your location, we recommend that you select: .

You can also select a web site from the following list:

## How to Get Best Site Performance

Select the China site (in Chinese or English) for best site performance. Other MathWorks country sites are not optimized for visits from your location.

### Americas

- América Latina (Español)
- Canada (English)
- United States (English)

### Europe

- Belgium (English)
- Denmark (English)
- Deutschland (Deutsch)
- España (Español)
- Finland (English)
- France (Français)
- Ireland (English)
- Italia (Italiano)
- Luxembourg (English)

- Netherlands (English)
- Norway (English)
- Österreich (Deutsch)
- Portugal (English)
- Sweden (English)
- Switzerland
- United Kingdom (English)

### Asia Pacific

- Australia (English)
- India (English)
- New Zealand (English)
- 中国
- 日本Japanese (日本語)
- 한국Korean (한국어)