I'm going to try and answer my own question in case anybody ever comes across this in the future, because I think I figured out my issue.
The Procrustes dissimilarity measure that Matlab gives is the sum of squared errors between the corresponding landmarks of the shapes after the shapes are rotated, translated, and transformed. The square root of this is the partial procrustes distance measure.
The R.M.S of all full procrustes distances to the mean shape that I find with R (author Ian Dryden) is approximately the RMS of the partial procrustes distances in my case, since shapes were very similar sizes.
The RMS of all procrustes distances to the mean shape is a way to measure the variability of a series of shapes. (The full procrustes distance is found after re-sizing the shapes onto the unit space).
Of course, if somebody reading this knows that I'm off my rocker, please correct me.