Collision over-simplification in RST

6 views (last 30 days)
Hello,
I am working with MATLAB to visualize the collision meshes of a robot I've designed. When using the show(robot) function, I notice that the collision meshes appear less detailed, I guess, the idea is to optimize execution time and reduce CPU load.
Could you please provide information on the maximum number of triangles allowed per STL file for collision meshes? I aim to achieve a balance between having detailed collision meshes and maintaining computational efficiency.
How it's supposed to look like :
meshTri = stlread("concept_c-bras5_col.stl");
trisurf(meshTri)
axis equal
How it actually looks like :
rbt = importrobot("concept.urdf");
show(rbt,Collisions="on");
As you can see it's really ugly. Do you know how to improve the collision meshes make them more accurate ?

Accepted Answer

Githin John
Githin John on 12 Jun 2024
Hello,
You are seeing this over-simplification because it makes use of the convex hull of the available mesh, as we need a convex mesh for the collision check.
You could make use of convex decomposition of your mesh to get a more represntative collision mesh.
robotCollisionDecomp = importrobot("concept.urdf",CollisionDecomposition=true);
You can check this link to see more details about how to customize the decomposition of your mesh.
Alternatively, you could use collisionVHACD to decompose just the required mesh.
meshTri = stlread("concept_c-bras5_col.stl");
decomposedMesh = collisionVHACD(meshTri);
showCollisionArray(decomposedMesh);
Then clear the approximated collision mesh from the rigidBody and replace with the decomposed one.
rbt.Bodies{indexOfBody}.clearCollision;
for i=1:numel(decomposedMesh)
rbt.Bodies{indexOfBody}.addCollision(decomposedMesh{i})
end
More details here.

More Answers (0)

Categories

Find more on Computational Geometry in Help Center and File Exchange

Tags

Products


Release

R2023b

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!