Simple Matlab Random Number Generation
2 views (last 30 days)
Show older comments
I have to get 5 random numbers a1, a2, a3, a4, a5 where each a1, a2, a3, a4, a5 should be between [-0.5, 0.5] and sum i.e. a1 + a2 + a3 + a4 + a5 = 1.
How should I do it?
4 Comments
Paulo Silva
on 28 Feb 2011
I deleted my answer (the one that was accepted but it wasn't the best one) and voted on Bruno's and Matt's answers.
Please reselect (Sam or someone who can (admins?!)) the best answer, thank you.
Accepted Answer
chris hinkle
on 27 Feb 2011
Create 5 arrays that have all possible combinations of these numbers then generate a random number that is between 1 and length of array and then use that value as the index for the array and viola, there's your number. The size of these arrays can be controlled by the resolution you go to.
0 Comments
More Answers (2)
Bruno Luong
on 27 Feb 2011
To generate true uniform distribution, the correct method is not quite straightforward. I strongly recommend Roger Stafford's FEX,
http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/9700-random-vectors-with-fixed-sum
3 Comments
the cyclist
on 27 Feb 2011
Agreed that this is the definitive answer. Specifically for Sam's solution:
X = randfixedsum(5,10000,1,-0.5,0.5);
Matt Tearle
on 27 Feb 2011
How about a brute-force approach?
ntot = 0;
n = 10000;
x = zeros(n,5);
while ntot<n
r = rand(100,4)-0.5;
r5 = 1 - sum(r,2);
idx = (r5>-0.5) & (r5<0.5);
tmp = [r(idx,:),r5(idx)];
nidx = min(size(tmp,1),n-ntot);
x(ntot+1:ntot+nidx,:) = tmp(1:nidx,:);
ntot = ntot + nidx;
end
1 Comment
the cyclist
on 28 Feb 2011
My first reaction to this solution was that, as a rejection method (with a loop, no less!), it would be much slower than Roger's method. The reality is that is does comparably well, speed-wise. I haven't done a full-blown comparison, but I think the reason is two-fold. First, you "semi-vectorized" by pulling chunks of random numbers at a time. Second, and I think more importantly, the accept/reject fraction is pretty good. (It might not be so favorable otherwise, like if the marginals were on [0,1] and still had to sum to 1.)
This solution is highly intuitive, and I believe leads to marginal distributions and correlations between summands that are identical to Roger's solution.
See Also
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!