- Incorrect mask format: Masks should be binary (0s and 1s), where 1s represent the object and 0s represent the background.
- Incorrect mask dimensions or alignment: Each mask should align perfectly with its corresponding object in the input image. Misalignment or incorrect dimensions can lead the network to learn incorrect representations.
- Improper handling of multiple objects: Ensure that for images with multiple objects, each object has a separate mask array, and these are correctly associated with their respective bounding boxes and labels.
- Underfitting: With only 10 epochs and 900 iterations, the network might not have had enough exposure to the data to learn the complex task of mask prediction. This is especially true if the dataset is varied or the task is particularly challenging.
- Learning rate and optimization: If the learning rate is not set appropriately, the network might not converge to a good solution. Similarly, the choice of optimizer and its settings can impact training effectiveness.
- Complexity of the dataset: Some datasets are inherently more challenging due to factors like object occlusion, variability in object appearance, or complex backgrounds. More training time or a larger dataset might be necessary to achieve good performance.
- Verify Mask Inputs: Double-check how the masks are prepared and fed into the network. Ensure they are correctly formatted, aligned, and associated with their corresponding objects.
- Increase Training: If possible, try to increase the number of epochs or iterations, given your hardware limitations. This could help the network learn more complex patterns and improve mask prediction.
- Experiment with Hyperparameters: Adjusting learning rates, batch sizes, or even the architecture (e.g., the depth of the feature extractor) can sometimes yield better results.
- Data Augmentation: If you're limited by dataset size or diversity, data augmentation can be a powerful tool to improve model robustness and performance without needing more original data.