Training deep learning network on GPU is significantly slower than using CPU

13 views (last 30 days)
I am training a CNN-LSTM regression network on matlab 2023b.
layers = [...
sequenceInputLayer([1440 1 1],'Name','input')
flattenLayer('Name','flatten')
convolution1dLayer(5,2,'Padding','same','WeightsInitializer','he','Name','conv','DilationFactor',1);
batchNormalizationLayer('Name','bn')
reluLayer('Name','relu')
lstmLayer(24,'OutputMode',"last",'Name','bil4','RecurrentWeightsInitializer','He','InputWeightsInitializer','He')
dropoutLayer(0.1,'Name','drop3')
fullyConnectedLayer(1,'Name','fc')
regressionLayer('Name','output') ];
MaxEpochs = 200;
learningrate = 0.0061;
learningrate = 0.001;
MiniBatchSize = 64;
solver = 'adam';
options = trainingOptions(solver, ...
'MaxEpochs',MaxEpochs, ...
'GradientThreshold',1, ...
'InitialLearnRate',learningrate, ...
'LearnRateSchedule',"piecewise", ...
'LearnRateDropPeriod',96, ...
'LearnRateDropFactor',0.25, ...
'MiniBatchSize',MiniBatchSize,...
'Verbose',false, ...
'Shuffle',"every-epoch",...
'ExecutionEnvironment',mydevice,...
'Plots','training-progress');
[net,info] = trainNetwork(XrTrain,YrTrain,layers,options);
My GPU is an NVIDIA RTX A4500. However, when I use GPU for training (mydevice = 'gpu'), the training speed is significantly slower than using CPU. Only 15223 iterations are completed in 5min using GPU, while 30372 iterations are completed using CPU.
The training results are acctually both good regardless of using GPU or CPU. The only difference is the time consumed. The GPU usage in Windows Task Manager is around 80% to 100% during training.
Could anyone please help with this problem? Are there special settings that need to be applied when training a DL network using GPU?

Answers (1)

Shreeya
Shreeya on 16 Dec 2023
GPU's are usually slower than CPU's but the advantage of a GPU is that thousands of threads can be computed simultaneously. Data transfer to the GRAM is expensive and GPU's can help with faster computations when:
  1. The batch size is huge
  2. The network is huge and requires a huge amount of matrix multiplications.
In the other case, the overhead outweighs the benefits of parallelization, and hence making the GPU computations slower.
You can refer to the answer below to understand more about this:

Categories

Find more on Image Data Workflows in Help Center and File Exchange

Products


Release

R2023b

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!