## Array indexing in parfor loops, why does this simple code not work?

### Right Grievous (view profile)

on 19 Jul 2014
Latest activity Commented on by Right Grievous

on 19 Jul 2014

### Jos (view profile)

Hi everybody,
I have recently been looking into parfor loops, mostly out of curiosity.
I have lots of loops which follow this syntax:
A = {};
B = [1 3 6];
parfor i = 1:3
A{B(i)} = i;
end
A
I don't understand why this code produces an error, I know that the order in which the calculations may be carried out are random but both A and B are defined outside the loop, the index into both is given by the loop number 'i' and the results can be entered into A randomly as it's an array. So why does this code fail?
Any help would be greatly appreciated,
Rod.
EDIT
My problem is basically that I have input matrices or vectors and for loops which I want to swap to parfor, but often I only want to access certain parts of each input matrix or vector. parfor won't accept a non continuous index like parfor i = [1 3 6], but you also can't use [1 3 6] as an index inside the loop because values might be duplicates.
The solution I've found is the inclusion of an if statement:
A = {};
parfor i = 1:6
if i == 1||i == 3||i == 6
A{i} = i;
end
end
A
Serious coders here will probably laugh at me, but it does what I want.

### Jos (view profile)

on 19 Jul 2014

You're getting the cell index for A out of vector B, however B could be defined with multiple elements having the same value (e.g. B=[1 1 6];), if this would occur multiple parallel instances would be attempting to access the same cell of A at the same time

Right Grievous

### Right Grievous (view profile)

on 19 Jul 2014
Thanks for your help, your comment actually helped me figure out a workaround, at least for my code.
Jos

### Jos (view profile)

on 19 Jul 2014
Just had a look there, cause I wanted to understand the reason properly too. You wanted to use A as a sliced variable, but it can't be a sliced variable because it doesn't satisfy the characteristics criterion for the form of indexing which states that (from the parfor help file) "Within the list of indices for the variable, exactly one index involves the loop variable" and "Within the list of indices for a sliced variable, one of these indices is of the form i, i+k, i-k, k+i, or k-i, where i is the loop variable and k is a constant or a simple (nonindexed) broadcast variable; and every other index is a constant, a simple broadcast variable, colon, or end"
Right Grievous

### Right Grievous (view profile)

on 19 Jul 2014
Yea... I can't make heads or tails of the matlab help for parfor, I really need to experiment in Matlab or have people tell me what is wrong with specific examples, in this case I worked out why it wasn't working (with your help) and now I understand parfor a bit better.
Incidentally, I have managed to parfor every possible loop in my code now and shaved off 2-3 seconds per iteration, of which there are typically 80, so that's great, thanks.
My main problem was wanting my parfor loop to run non-continuously i.e. parfor i = [1 4 7 9] this is so that the data remain arranged in a constant manner when I index into an array using 'i' and I can find it later without a problem, parfor can't do this but I can do parfor i = 1:10 with the inclusion of an if statement, of course this means some of the 'workers' will get loops which don't actually require any work, but I'm prepared to make that sacrifice.
I've also found concatenating data inside the loop and then 'unpacking' it when the loop completes helps with a lot of problems.
Thanks again!