Asked by Right Grievous
on 19 Jul 2014

Hi everybody,

I have recently been looking into parfor loops, mostly out of curiosity.

I have lots of loops which follow this syntax:

A = {};

B = [1 3 6];

parfor i = 1:3

A{B(i)} = i;

end

A

I don't understand why this code produces an error, I know that the order in which the calculations may be carried out are random but both A and B are defined outside the loop, the index into both is given by the loop number 'i' and the results can be entered into A randomly as it's an array. So why does this code fail?

Any help would be greatly appreciated,

Rod.

EDIT

My problem is basically that I have input matrices or vectors and for loops which I want to swap to parfor, but often I only want to access certain parts of each input matrix or vector. parfor won't accept a non continuous index like parfor i = [1 3 6], but you also can't use [1 3 6] as an index inside the loop because values might be duplicates.

The solution I've found is the inclusion of an if statement:

A = {};

parfor i = 1:6

if i == 1||i == 3||i == 6

A{i} = i;

end

end

A

Serious coders here will probably laugh at me, but it does what I want.

Answer by Jos
on 19 Jul 2014

Accepted Answer

Right Grievous
on 19 Jul 2014

Thanks for your help, your comment actually helped me figure out a workaround, at least for my code.

Jos
on 19 Jul 2014

Right Grievous
on 19 Jul 2014

Yea... I can't make heads or tails of the matlab help for parfor, I really need to experiment in Matlab or have people tell me what is wrong with specific examples, in this case I worked out why it wasn't working (with your help) and now I understand parfor a bit better.

Incidentally, I have managed to parfor every possible loop in my code now and shaved off 2-3 seconds per iteration, of which there are typically 80, so that's great, thanks.

My main problem was wanting my parfor loop to run non-continuously i.e. parfor i = [1 4 7 9] this is so that the data remain arranged in a constant manner when I index into an array using 'i' and I can find it later without a problem, parfor can't do this but I can do parfor i = 1:10 with the inclusion of an if statement, of course this means some of the 'workers' will get loops which don't actually require any work, but I'm prepared to make that sacrifice.

I've also found concatenating data inside the loop and then 'unpacking' it when the loop completes helps with a lot of problems.

Thanks again!

Sign in to comment.

Opportunities for recent engineering grads.

Apply Today
## 0 Comments

Sign in to comment.