How to use for loop ?
1 view (last 30 days)
Show older comments
Let's say I have a matrix A = zeros(1000,500). I have two another matrices of size 2 X 50 each for example B = [1 2 3 .... 50 ; 2 4 6 .... 100] and C = [3 6 9 .... 150 ; 4 8 12 ....200]. Let's say I have another matrix D of same size 2 X 50 with some numbers for example [2 4 2 ... 67 ; 6 9 3 .... 54]. Now I have add up all these random numbers in matrix D into the matrix A only at the positions dictated by the matrix B and C. For example the first row in matrix B and C as in [1 2 3 .... 50] and [3 6 9 .... 150] are the x and y positions/co-ordinate where the first row of random numbers as in [2 4 2 .... 67] are to be added with matrix A. The same thing goes for the second row also. Clearly, I have to add [2 4 2 .... 67] to the matrix A at the positions [(1,3) (2,6) (3,9) .... (50,150)] and similarly add up [6 9 3 .... 54] to the matrix A at the positions [(2,4) (4,8) (6,12) .... (100,200)].
How can I use for loop to code this ?
0 Comments
Accepted Answer
Jan
on 20 Sep 2017
It does not matter, if B and C are matrices, but you care about the value of the elements only - correctly?
for k = 1:numel(B)
A(B(k), C(K)) = A(B(k), C(K)) + D(k);
end
This seems to be very easy. Did you try anything else?
2 Comments
Rik
on 20 Sep 2017
That isn't the number 1, it is the lowercase L. The function numel counts the number of elements of a matrix. It is therefore equivalent to prod(size(B)) or length(B(:))
More Answers (1)
Rik
on 20 Sep 2017
Edited: Rik
on 21 Sep 2017
Why insist on a loop?
A(sub2ind(size(A), B(:), C(:))) = D(:);
That should do the same thing.
Edit: the difference between my solution and Jan's is that mine doesn't work if the indices in B an C are non-unique combinations, which you could check with this:
length(unique([B(:) C(:)],'rows'))==numel(B)
If that is false, you can't use my solution.
if length(unique([B(:) C(:)],'rows'))==numel(B)
%A(B(:),C(:))=D(:);
A(sub2ind(size(A), B(:), C(:))) = D(:);
else
for k = 1:numel(B)
A(B(k), C(K)) = A(B(k), C(K)) + D(k);
end
end
3 Comments
Rik
on 21 Sep 2017
Good point. I'll edit my answer, thanks for the correction. Every time I make this mistake I think it's odd for Matlab to work in the way it does.
Jan
on 22 Sep 2017
@Rik: I agree that it would be more intuitive to process the indices serially instead of accessing a rectangular sub-matrix.
See Also
Categories
Find more on Loops and Conditional Statements in Help Center and File Exchange
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!