MATLAB Answers

0

lsqcurvefit not working, large f(x) values during iterations

Asked by Kelly McGuire on 6 Apr 2017
Latest activity Edited by John D'Errico
on 6 Apr 2017
I am trying to use lsqcurvefit to fit data using a nonlinear function (modelFun in the code), but I just can't get it to work. Do you see anything wrong with my equation or code that would give the figure I've attached here?
t = VarName1; %Time data points in ms
y = VarName2; %Current data points
Diff = 2000; %Diffusion coefficient in um^2/ms
Co = 0.0001; %Initial concentration in uM
%Plot of actual data
plot(t,y,'--b');
xlabel('Time');
ylabel('Current');
%This equation has four parameters: p1, p2, p3, and p4. p1 is k1 (on rate
%constant), p2 is k2 (off rate constant), p3 is the length of the unstirred
%layer (L), and p4 is iN (total current). modelFun = @(p,t) (-169 * (1 - (0.0004 / (p(1) * 0.0001 + 0.0004)) * exp(-((p(1) * 0.0001 + 0.0004) .* t)) + 0.0004 / (p(1) * 0.0001 + 0.0004)));
%Non-linear least squares fit of data using model function
format long
%opts = statset('MaxIter',1000);
options=optimset('disp','iter','LargeScale','off','TolFun',0.000001,'MaxIter',100000,'MaxFunEvals',1000000);
lb = [100]; %k1 is in uM^(-1) ms^(-1), k2 is in ms^(-1), L is in um, and total current, I, is in nA
ub = [400];
startingVals = [296];
coefEsts = lsqcurvefit(modelFun, startingVals, t, y, lb, ub, options);
xgrid = linspace(0,3.11E+5,100);
line(xgrid, modelFun(coefEsts, xgrid), 'Color', 'r');

  0 Comments

Sign in to comment.

1 Answer

Answer by John D'Errico
on 6 Apr 2017
Edited by John D'Errico
on 6 Apr 2017
 Accepted Answer

To quote you:
%This equation has four parameters: p1, p2, p3, and p4. p1 is k1 (on rate
%constant), p2 is k2 (off rate constant), p3 is the length of the unstirred
%layer (L), and p4 is iN (total current).
No. Your model has ONE parameter. P(1).
modelFun = @(p,t) (-169 * (1 - (0.0004 / (p(1) * 0.0001 + 0.0004)) * exp(-((p(1) * 0.0001 + 0.0004) .* t)) + 0.0004 / (p(1) * 0.0001 + 0.0004)));
Everything else besides t is a CONSTANT. Fixed. Immutable. Frozen.
Can you truly be surprised that it did not converge to something reasonable?
Worse, while I lack any data,
modelFun = @(p,t) (-169 * (1 - (0.0004 / (p(1) * 0.0001 + 0.0004)) * exp(-((p(1) * 0.0001 + 0.0004) .* t)) + 0.0004 / (p(1) * 0.0001 + 0.0004)));
t = linspace(0,3,100);
plot(t,modelFun(296,t))
So your model will not even have the chance of a snowball in a very hot place to survive.

  8 Comments

Better.
What range do you expect those parameters to live in? I assume you may want this:
100 <= P(1) <= 400
although I think there are problem with that range.
but anyway, where does P(2) live?
The point is, all I will do at first is plot your function, substituting values of P(1) and P(2).
In fact, as close as I can come to your target curve is this:
plot(t,modelFun([.1,-1],t))
Note that is it not even close to the curve you originally showed. Just because it has an exp in there does not mean it will have the desired shape.
Ok. Its difficult to visualize this without some help. so...
syms t p1 p2
f = -169 .* (1 - (p2 ./ (p1 .* 100 + p2)) .* exp(-((p1 .* 100 + p2) .* t)) + p2 ./ (p1 .* 100 + p2));
pretty(f)
p2 exp(-t (100 p1 + p2)) 169 169 p2
---------------------------- - ----------- - 169
100 p1 + p2 100 p1 + p2
Now we should be able to see a bit. The problem is, I'm not sure that model can possibly fit your target curve for any values of p(1) and p(2).
So lets look at that question. If we take the second and third terms, and recognize that the model needs to approach roughly 10 from your target curve as t-->inf.
Then we can solve for the value of 100*p(1)+p(2) as approximately:
100*p(1)+p(2) = -169*P(2)/179
In order for this curve to approach an asymptote as t-->inf, we NEED 100*p(1)+p(2) to be a positive number, because it is in the exponential term, and we need that to be a negative exponential.
Therefore, we KNOW that p(2) must be negative. This is true with absolute certainty if your model is to be believed.
But you seem to have indicated that p(2) is a secondary rate parameter. So I'm not at all sure you have the right model.

Sign in to comment.