Is it a bug to implement a transposed direct-form I (TDF-I) in Simulink?
1 view (last 30 days)
Show older comments
On the Mathworks page (https://www.mathworks.com/help/signal/ref/dfilt.df1t.html), the description of the dfilt.df1t function shows the block diagram of the form:
but in the classical representation, the minus sign is placed before the denominator coefficients:
.
Thus, if in the implementation of Matworks with the initial states of the numerator and denominator sides equal to 5, the first output will be ():
then in the classical form under the same conditions the first output is
.
Wouldn't it be more correct to move the minus sign to the gain block?
0 Comments
Answers (0)
See Also
Categories
Find more on Array and Matrix Mathematics in Help Center and File Exchange
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!