This is machine translation

Translated by Microsoft
Mouseover text to see original. Click the button below to return to the English version of the page.

Note: This page has been translated by MathWorks. Click here to see
To view all translated materials including this page, select Country from the country navigator on the bottom of this page.

Feature Selection for Remaining Useful Life Prediction

For reliable remaining useful life (RUL) estimations, you want a condition indicator whose change over time is observable and connected with the system degradation process in a reliable, measurable way. The remaining useful life of a machine is the expected life or usage time remaining before the machine requires repair or replacement. Predicting remaining useful life from system data is a central goal of predictive-maintenance algorithms.

After you identify condition indicators (see Condition Indicators for Monitoring, Fault Detection, and Prediction), selecting useful condition indicators out of all available features is the next step in building a reliable RUL prediction model.

Predictive Maintenance Toolbox™ offers three feature selection metrics for accurate RUL prediction: monotonicity, trendability, and prognosability. These metrics rank the identified condition indicators on a scale ranging from 0 through 1. A higher ranked feature tracks the degradation process more reliably and hence, is more desirable to train the RUL prediction model.

  • Monotonicity characterizes the trend of a feature as the system evolves toward failure. As a system gets progressively closer to failure, a suitable condition indicator has a monotonic positive or negative trend. For more information, see monotonicity.

  • Prognosability is a measure of the variability of a feature at failure relative to the range between its initial and final values. A more prognosable feature has less variation at failure relative to the range between its initial and final values. For more information, see prognosability.

  • Trendability provides a measure of similarity between the trajectories of a feature measured in multiple run-to-failure experiments. Trendability of a candidate condition indicator is defined as the smallest absolute correlation between measurements. For more information, see trendability.

Using the selected features to train an appropriate RUL estimation model is the next step in the algorithm-design process. For information, see Models for Predicting Remaining Useful Life.

See Also

| |

Related Topics